Updated: August 7, 2026
Reviews
Reviews you can actually trust
We publish a review only when its author - a real client under a contract - has given written consent. So far we have fewer consents than completed projects, which is why there is no wall of quotes here. There are rules by which they appear.
Anonymous glowing quotes with no name and no contract we do not publish at all - even if they are genuine.
In short
Why there are no twenty five-star quotes here
A wall of reviews is easy to buy or write yourself - which is why it proves nothing. We took the longer road: a review appears here only after the author's written consent, with a real industry and project date. While consents are being signed, it is more honest to show the rules than invented words. You can already check us another way - through the registers, the case studies and a conversation with the person who runs projects.
Rules
Five rules for publishing reviews
These rules have applied since day one and do not depend on how badly we need a good review.
- 01
Only a real client
A review can only be left by an enterprise we had a contract and a project with. There will be no reviews «from friends of the company» here.
- 02
Only with written consent
A name, position and company name appear only after the author's written consent. No consent - no publication, however flattering the quote.
- 03
No anonymous praise
«Everything was great, highly recommend! - Alex» - we do not publish that format at all. A review without project context tells the reader nothing.
- 04
Criticism is not cut out
If a client wrote that something was hard or that we made a mistake somewhere, it stays in the text. A review with the uncomfortable parts cut out stops being a review.
- 05
Projects without consent - anonymised
Until there is consent, a project can be shown without the company name: industry, city, headcount, timeframe. Those stories live on the case studies page.
What will be here
What will appear in this section - and what never will
The section fills up as clients give their consents. The rules do not change.
What you will see here
- Reviews with a name, position and company name - by consent
- Industry, headcount and project timeframe next to the text
- The project date, not «recently»
- Words about what was hard - unretouched
- Anonymised case studies - linked, while consents are signed
What will never be here
- Bought or commissioned reviews
- Anonymous five-star quotes with no project
- Reviews from «employees» who do not exist
- Cut-out criticism and retouched wording
- Other companies' logos without written permission
If you are our client and ready to leave a review - write to info@workin.com.ua or tell your project manager. The consent takes one email.
How a review appears
Four steps from project to publication
Every review on this page travels the same path.
- 01
The project settles into a working rhythm
People are on shift, the first weeks are worked through, replacements - if any - are closed. Asking for an assessment earlier makes no sense.
Who does itProject managerWhenafter the group starts - 02
We ask for an honest assessment
We ask not «write us a nice review» but «what worked and what was hard». The answer is recorded verbatim.
Who does itProject managerWhenone conversation - 03
The author gives written consent
We agree the text, name, position and company name. The author may remove the company name - then the review runs in anonymised form.
Who does itClientWhenone email - 04
We publish as is
The text appears here unretouched, with the industry, headcount and project date. We only fix typos.
Who does itWORKINWhenafter consent
Yes, this is slower than writing twenty quotes in an evening. But every line here can be verified.
Money
Why we do not buy reviews
The most honest «review» in our model is financial: WORKIN receives half of its fee only after the people have started their shifts. The enterprise votes with its money after the result, not before it. Buying five stars on third-party platforms on top of that would mean paying for what the acceptance acts already show.
Recruitment + migration support + state fees = project budget
Each recipient issues a separate invoice. Payments are not mixed.
What forRecruitment: sourcing, candidate vetting, coordination up to the first shift
When it is paid50% after the contract · 50% after the start
What forMigration documents: translation, permit, visa, residence permit, registration. A separate legal entity with its own account
When it is paidOne payment before paperwork begins
What forState fees for processing documents. Amounts are set by law
When it is paidOn filing each document
What forHousing, transport, meals and other agreed expenses. The scope and cost are fixed separately for the specific city and group
When it is paidOn the schedule agreed in the contract
What the WORKIN recruitment fee covers
- Sourcing and vetting candidates for your profile
- Approval of every profile with the enterprise
- Coordination of the document route with the migration partner
- Arrival logistics, meeting at the border and transfer
- Preparation of the first working day and support after the start
We receive the second half only when the worker has started the shift.
The estimate depends on the country, trade, number of workers, pay and additional project conditions: housing, transport and meals.
Line-by-line amounts will be published once the current price list is confirmed and state fees are re-checked against official sources - with the date of validity next to them.
While the section fills up
How to check us right now
Four ways to form your own impression without a single quote.
Start your own project and compare
Page
Staff requestThe request triggers an availability check and a calculation - the fastest way to see how we actually work.
Check that the promises are fixed on paper
Page
ContractThe contract structure block by block: timings, money, guarantees, liability of the parties.
See the figures for management
Page
Commercial proposalThe proposal shows the cost structure across the three payees and the timeframe.
Ask a question directly
Page
Questions and answersAnswers on timings, money, documents and responsibility - no manager's retelling.
Questions and answers
What companies ask about reviews
Verification, references and negative feedback.
Because we publish only reviews with the author's written consent, and consents are signed more slowly than projects finish. We deliberately do not fill this page with invented quotes.
Every published review carries a name, position, company and project date. The company can be found in open registers and, if you wish, contacted directly.
With the client's consent - yes. We arrange reference calls for enterprises heading to a contract: ask your project manager, they will agree the contact.
If its author is a real client and gave consent - yes. Criticism is not cut from the texts. We admit mistakes and show what we changed after them.
An anonymous review cannot be verified, so it weighs nothing. We chose fewer reviews, but ones backed by a named enterprise.
Workers' stories appear in case studies and materials - also only with the person's consent and without personal data that could harm them.
Tell your project manager or write to info@workin.com.ua. We will send a short form: the text, the consent, how to credit you. Publication comes after your confirmation.
We do not commission or buy reviews anywhere. If you see a «WORKIN» quote somewhere that is not on this page - we do not answer for it.
Request
Form your own impression
- 01A manager reviews the request and clarifies details
- 02You receive a route, a timeline and a cost structure for your project
- 03Any contract decision comes only after the estimate
Need a detailed request? Fill in the employer form
Staffing request